Plessy vs. Ferguson

Worksheet by Amanda Donato
Plessy vs. Ferguson Grade 11 worksheet preview
Subjects
History
Grades
Grade 11
Language
ENG
Assignments
122 classrooms used this worksheet

Plessy v. Ferguson: Understand the 'separate but equal' ruling and its legal impact.

Breaking the Rules You may have heard the saying, “Some rules are meant to be broken.” In 1890, a man named Homer Plessy broke the rules. The state of Louisiana had passed the Separate Car Act, which required railway companies to have “separate but equal” train cars for black people and white people. A person who sat in the wrong car had to pay a $25 fine or go to jail for 20 days. You can probably guess that the cars for blacks weren’t as nice as the cars for whites. Not only that, it seemed unfair to make black people sit separately. A group of citizens called the “Free People of Color in New Orleans” formed a committee dedicated to repealing this law. They convinced Homer Plessy, who was 7 white and 1 black, to test the law by sitting in a whites-only train car. When Plessy was asked to move, he refused and was arrested. The Argument Plessy argued that Louisiana’s Separate Car Act violated the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It says that states may not “deny to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” He argued that requiring black people to sit separately from white people implied that blacks were inferior to whites, and therefore unequal.Issue: Is it Constitutional to make black people sit in a separate car from white people?Decision: Yes, because the Constitution only protects legal equality, not social equality. The Decision The Supreme Court disagreed. It saw separate train cars as an issue of social equality, not political or legal equality. It said separating the races did not take away civil or political rights. Justice Brown wrote for the Court, saying that “if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane.” Justice Brown said there had been separate schools for black and white students for a very long time, and many court cases had decided that states were allowed to have these segregated schools. Out of the nine justices, Justice Harlan was the only one to dissent, or disagree. He wrote that “our constitution is color-blind” and does not tolerate “classes among citizens.” He said the Court’s decision would lead to racial hatred and increased attacks against black peoples’ rights. Long Time Coming... It took 58 more years for the Supreme Court to finally reject the idea of “separate but equal.” In 1954, the Court rejected this doctrine in a case called Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in which parents fought against “separate but equal” schools. (However, that case only applied to schools—not trains, buses, or other facilities.)How did the Court’s reasoning change? Read the following statements and decide whether they are from the Plessy decision (supporting separate but equal) or the Brown decision (rejecting separate but equal). Plessy vs. Ferguson The 14th Amendment would not have been intended to abolish differences based on color. Laws that allow or require the races to be separate do not necessarily imply that one race is inferior. State governments have the power to decide whether to keep the races separate. Children and adults can be treated differently under the same law, so equality under the law does not mean blacks and whites must be treated exactly the same. The 14th Amendment could not have been intended to force the two races to mingle together when they do not want to. If requiring blacks and whites to be separate suggests that blacks are inferior, it is only because people choose to see it that way. Laws cannot change social prejudices. Blacks and whites can only have social equality by appreciating each other and choosing to be together. Brown vs. Board of Education The Impact of separating people just because of race is even bigger when the law says it’s okay. Just because racial segregation existed when the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868 does not mean it is Constitutional. Separate educational facilities are naturally unequal. Making facilities equal is not enough as long as blacks and whites are still separated. Research shows that separating white and black children just because of their races make black children feel like they are inferior. Separating races in school makes them unequal under the law and violates the 14th Amendment.

Civil Rights Constitutional Law US History
Educational Standards
Make it yours